Theory[ edit ] The theory of the objective correlative as it relates to literature was largely developed through the writings of the poet and literary critic T. Eliotwho is associated with the literary group called the New Critics.
Eliot puts forward his contention that much of the critical has been devoted to analysing the character of Hamlet, rather than analysing the play, which should be the primary business of the critics.
Eliot, on the other hand, praises J.
In order to establish his contentions, Eliot goes on to examine the play from a historical perspective. He points out that the play is the longest and there are superfluous and inconsistent scenes with the versification being variable.
Not only this, Eliot presents his assumption that the play must have been written during a period of intense emotional crisis. Even he relates it to another great production art, Mona Lisa and calls the play "Mona Lisa" of literature, thereby creating another controversy. Shakespeare could not project any external elements which would fitfully reflect his inner world and could not present external events or elements which would justify his terrible mental anguish.
That is to say, he is neither fully mad nor is always feigning. He tries to establish the second case by pointing out his levity, puns and repetitions of phrase, which point towards a mental disorder.essay by T.S.
Eliot by rose_black_1 in Types > School Work, hamlet, and t. s. eliot. Shakespeare’s design, we perceive his Hamlet to be superposed upon Documents Similar To Hamlet and His Problems T.S.
Eliot. Hamlet and 5/5(1). T.S. Eliot's famous poem The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock shares many correlating themes with William Shakespeare's Hamlet. Despite their evident similarities in style, Eliot criticizes Shakespeare's Hamlet in his essay Hamlet and His Problems, calling it "a .
they knew less about psychology than more recent Hamlet critics, but they were nearer in spirit to Shakespeare’s art; and as they insisted on the importance of the effect of the whole rather than on the importance of the leading character, they were nearer, in their old-fashioned way, to the secret of dramatic art in general.
Eliot, on the other hand, praises J.M. Robertson and Stoll, who, according to him, tried to shift the critical focus of Hamlet to a right direction by pointing out the genesis of Shakespeare’s play from his predecessors: “Hamlet is a stratification, that it represents the efforts of a series of men, each making what he could out of the work.
One of these few people is T. S. Eliot, who wrote an essay called “Hamlet and his Problems” in which he verbally attacks Shakespeare and claims that the storyline of “Hamlet” is more mixed up than the character himself. Hamlet and His Problems T.S. Eliot.
instead of treating the whole action of the play as due to Shakespeare’s design, we perceive his Hamlet to be superposed In the first essay in the.